Epstein recounts the early days (1988-1996) when West Virginia Governor Gaston Caperton instituted a program to put three computers in every classroom. It appears from the article that more equipment is available these days, but I know that many states, schools, teachers and students still have only severely limited access to hardware and software. As a teacher who routinely enjoys one-to-one laptop availability in so many classrooms where I work, I sometimes feel almost guilty when I think how fortunate we are in Maine to have such an aggressive one-to-one program.
Epstein emphasizes that technology is important, but not as important as those who use it, in particular the teachers who are in a position to leverage the use of available technology in their classrooms.
Technology spending is necessary and important to increase availability of technology tools and Internet infrastructure. But teachers must be at the center of change aimed at preparing students for the 21st century.I myself never cease to be amazed at what teachers are able to do with just a little technology when they also have a lot of spirit. Nevertheless, I must say there is a substantive difference between using a technology and having a technology. What I mean is the difference between having access to a portable SmartBoard and having a SmartBoard installed in a classroom. Or, having access to a computer lab and teachers and students having dedicated laptops. No matter how conscientious and creative a teacher may be, routine, ongoing "ownership" of a technology is unparalleled in enabling teachers and students to integrate that technology into the context of their education.
No comments:
Post a Comment